Realist: news and analytics

Русский / English / العربية

  • News
  • Russia
  • Caucasus
  • Opinion
  • Interviews
  • Experts
No Result
View All Result
Realist: news and analytics
  • News
  • Russia
  • Caucasus
  • Opinion
  • Interviews
  • Experts
No Result
View All Result
Realist: news and analytics

Peace or extinction? Why Armenia’s new agreement with Azerbaijan is seen as a path to national capitulation

Critics warn that the proposed “peace treaty” with Azerbaijan, shaped under foreign pressure, may lead to Armenia’s quiet dismantling — not reconciliation, but surrender.

   
April 18, 2025, 09:33
Opinion
Peace or extinction? Why Armenia’s new agreement with Azerbaijan is seen as a path to national capitulation

YEREVAN (Realist English). The Republic of Armenia stands at the brink of political extinction. This is not a figure of speech. The process has already begun: orchestrated externally, executed internally, and promoted under the deceptive label of “peace.” If not stopped, the so-called peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan may become not a roadmap to peace, but the final act of surrender — and the prologue to the nation’s disappearance.

Below is a summary of what Armenia’s current leadership appears ready to concede — without resistance and without shame.

A treaty without guarantees, without benefit, without dignity
The draft agreement, developed under foreign pressure and on terms dictated by Baku, contains no enforceable security guarantees for Armenia. It can be broken by Azerbaijan at any time — a regime that has already shown genocidal intentions. Despite this, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has made no counter-demands in return for his declared willingness to sign.

Instead, Armenia would undertake the following irreversible commitments:

  • Silencing genocide: Armenia agrees to refrain from referencing the genocide and ethnic cleansing committed in Artsakh and Azerbaijan. It would also dissolve the OSCE Minsk Group — the only international body ever engaged in Karabakh conflict resolution. In effect, these crimes would be legitimized as acceptable outcomes. The Armenian government would thus be accepting the mass extermination and forced expulsion of Armenians as both normalized and legitimate — setting a precedent for similar actions within Armenia itself. As pro-Turkish Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan recently stated in parliament: «Since no one lives there anymore — there are no Armenians — there are no rights left to defend. This agenda is over.»
    If accepted, what happened in Artsakh could soon happen in Syunik or Tavush.
  • Ignoring cultural destruction: The Armenian government would forgo any official response to the systematic eradication of Armenian cultural heritage in Artsakh — a textbook case of cultural genocide.
  • Erasing national tragedy: The agreement implies silence on the Armenian Genocide and the forced exile of millions (1893–2023), all to appease Turkey — Azerbaijan’s ally and a co-author of these crimes. Armenia would effectively renounce its right to historical truth.
  • Strategic concessions: Azerbaijan and Turkey would be granted a land corridor through Meghri and possibly other regions — without reciprocal guarantees. Alarmingly, the planned railway through Meghri would not be overseen by Armenian border or customs authorities, a direct threat to sovereignty.
  • Normalization of territorial loss: Azerbaijan’s occupation of approximately 240 km² of Armenia’s internationally recognized territory is being quietly accepted. It is neither mentioned in the draft nor tied to the treaty’s finalization — and is increasingly omitted from official rhetoric.
  • Undermining statehood: Armenia’s Declaration of Independence — the legal cornerstone of its statehood — would be removed from its constitutional framework and reduced to a symbolic, non-binding document.
  • Withdrawal from legal defense: Armenia would commit to dropping all international legal claims against Azerbaijan over war crimes and crimes against humanity committed against Armenians.
  • Historical falsification: The Armenian educational system would be revised to distort national history and erode collective memory and identity.
  • Criminalizing patriotism: Citizens and civil society organizations who oppose Turkey’s and Azerbaijan’s anti-Armenian policies — or defend Armenian dignity — would face legal restrictions and potential persecution.

A silent liquidation under the banner of “peace”

These measures point to one goal: the quiet elimination of the Armenian state, without international uproar, under the cover of false “normalization.” What is sold as diplomacy is, in reality, capitulation. What is labeled “peace” is, in truth, a surrender of national existence.

At the previous stage, Armenia lost Artsakh — nearly one-quarter of its de facto territory from 1991 to 2020. Now, the groundwork is being laid for the dismantling of what remains — through the erosion of Armenia’s military, economic, demographic, cultural, and moral foundations. A new wave of deportation is not a distant possibility — it is a matter of time.

This government has abandoned the principle of resistance as a foundation of state policy. If the great powers have long since disregarded Armenian blood, Pashinyan seems intent on proving that, to him, it means even less.

This “peace agreement” is a new Treaty of Kars — only worse. The 1921 deal with Kemalist Turkey, signed under Bolshevik pressure, at least came with Soviet security guarantees. Today, Armenia gets nothing. The peace this agreement promises will be short-lived, deceptive, and pave the way for the country’s physical and political erasure.

Capitulation must be rejected — resistance must begin now

The path chosen by the government must be abandoned. Resistance is not just necessary — it must begin immediately. Unfortunately, the opposition has failed in its responsibility. Whether due to incompetence or design, it has left the people leaderless and unguided. The state apparatus has walled itself off from society. And the nation stands without a head.

Tomorrow may already be too late.

Armen Ayvazyan – military analyst

ArmeniaArmenia’s Foreign PolicyArmenian IssueAzerbaijanAzerbaijan’s Foreign Policy
Previous Post

US accuses Chinese satellite firm of aiding Houthi attacks on American warships

Next Post

Trump’s trillion-dollar deals are not a price tag on Palestine

Related Posts

Armenian monastery Dadivank
Opinion

Dadivank: The Legacy of Christ’s Apostles in Artsakh

17 December, 2025
An unusual phenomenon at the Church of the Holy Savior in Shushi
Opinion

An unusual phenomenon at the Church of the Holy Savior in Shushi

3 November, 2025
War with Iran seen as inevitable, Armenia warned of looming regional storm
Opinion

War with Iran seen as inevitable, Armenia warned of looming regional storm

21 September, 2025
Putin, Trump and Zelensky: is a trilateral meeting necessary?
Opinion

Putin, Trump and Zelensky: is a trilateral meeting necessary?

27 August, 2025
Russia’s elite: from Soviet nomenklatura to state corporations
Opinion

Russia’s elite: from Soviet nomenklatura to state corporations

25 August, 2025
A meeting of minds across time: Alaska’s role in U.S.–Russia history
Opinion

A meeting of minds across time: Alaska’s role in U.S.–Russia history

17 August, 2025
Most Popular
Most Popular
From voice of support to figurehead: Pahlavi seeks to steer Iran’s uprising

Russia remains EU’s fourth-largest gas supplier despite diversification push

11 January, 2026

BRUSSELS (Realist English). Russia remained the European Union’s fourth-largest supplier of natural gas in 2025, exporting almost 38bn cubic metres...

From voice of support to figurehead: Pahlavi seeks to steer Iran’s uprising

From voice of support to figurehead: Pahlavi seeks to steer Iran’s uprising

11 January, 2026

TEHRAN (Realist English). Protests across Iran entered their third week on Sunday amid a markedly harsher crackdown by the authorities,...

Khamenei says Iran will not retreat in face of foreign-backed unrest

Venezuela’s real power lies beyond the presidency after Maduro’s arrest

10 January, 2026

CARACAS (Realist English). A day after U.S. special forces swept into the Venezuelan capital and detained former president Nicolas Maduro,...

Khamenei says Iran will not retreat in face of foreign-backed unrest

Khamenei says Iran will not retreat in face of foreign-backed unrest

10 January, 2026

TEHRAN (Realist English). Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei said on Friday that the Islamic Republic would stand firm...

Opinion

Armenian monastery Dadivank

Dadivank: The Legacy of Christ’s Apostles in Artsakh

17 December, 2025

YEREVAN (Realist English). In Artsakh, before the ethnic cleansing and forced deportation – simply put, genocide – carried out by...

An unusual phenomenon at the Church of the Holy Savior in Shushi

An unusual phenomenon at the Church of the Holy Savior in Shushi

3 November, 2025

YEREVAN (Realist English). In the distant year 1979, as a third-year university student, I used to visit the Church of...

War with Iran seen as inevitable, Armenia warned of looming regional storm

War with Iran seen as inevitable, Armenia warned of looming regional storm

21 September, 2025

YEREVAN (Realist English). The war with Iran is drawing ever closer. And once again, this pulls Armenia into a zone...

Putin, Trump and Zelensky: is a trilateral meeting necessary?

Putin, Trump and Zelensky: is a trilateral meeting necessary?

27 August, 2025

MOSCOW (Realist English). Although more than a week has passed since the meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S....

All rights reserved.

© 2017-2025

  • About Us
  • Mission and Values
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

Follow Realist English

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Russia
  • Caucasus
  • Opinion
  • Interviews
  • Experts

Русский / English / العربية